Pg?

Have a good idea? Let us know
Post Reply
User avatar
cherry-babeh
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Pg?

Post by cherry-babeh » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:01 pm

Sorry if this is a bad idea (TT_TT) but i see lots of cute images disabled becouse of blood or ketchup or whatever and some disabled becouse of some pantsu. im not talking like anything big tht would impact the rules but how about a Pg alert thing like we have with spoilers. You guys could probally think of a better name but ill just call it pg alert for now, agian sorry if this is a bad idea

User avatar
Fhant
Posts: 2045
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:31 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Pg?

Post by Fhant » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:52 pm

Keep in mind, this is a worksafe imageboard. If the PG alert should be implemented, people will add more images in the way of hentai and gore. The idea for this PG alert is great but how do you keep people from not viewing the said image? Since spoiler images are only blocked by the image and after one click you can see the image, but how do you it with the PG? Age restriction?
[Signature space. $10]

User avatar
cherry-babeh
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Re: Pg?

Post by cherry-babeh » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:00 pm

Fhant wrote:Keep in mind, this is a worksafe imageboard. If the PG alert should be implemented, people will add more images in the way of hentai and gore. The idea for this PG alert is great but how do you keep people from not viewing the said image? Since spoiler images are only blocked by the image and after one click you can see the image, but how do you it with the PG? Age restriction?
Well the rules would still restric lots of gore and there would still be no hentai but people would know rather they are aloud to veiw it, like i said i dont want it to impact the rules sevearly.

User avatar
Watanuki
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:41 pm

Re: Pg?

Post by Watanuki » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:16 pm

your fundamental suggestion is in fact a huge change to the rules because even excluding guro, porn, or whatever, we would be accepting less serious tags like pantsu or loli. by allowing pantsu for example, people would be uploading it more often, in which case we'd also run into problems like camel toe being uploaded more often too.

This idea has been rejected several times due to the reasons Fhant gave. Your suggestion of a pg/age check is nothing more than wanting to see the disabled images.
Image

User avatar
cherry-babeh
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Re: Pg?

Post by cherry-babeh » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:19 pm

I apoligize agian it was a bad idea in the first place

Post Reply