Tag suggestion

[Yatchen]

Everything in your first group of suggestions has been rejected before...except balloons, I think? I think that was just...lost in the shuffle. Or never made it to the next level.

As for the second...I kind of like injury as an idea, but as a tag, I think it would be...weird. It's not like shuu wants to promote wounded people on the board, so. :T
Wouldn't mind illness, but I wonder how often it would be used.

[Kairi-chan]

So, if they've been rejected in the past, they've been rejected and that's it? They won't be considered again? D:

[Yatchen]

They can be if someone speaks up and wants to talk about them again. :3

[cosmictails]

I was suggesting, but I'm thinking a "dual persona" tag would be useful for the list. This tag means a duplicate of the same person or doppelganger of the same, but similar person.

Thanks!

[Adore]

They can be if someone speaks up and wants to talk about them again. :3

Like "orange hair"! That was suggested and rejected a lot before it was added.

[Kairi-chan]

They can be if someone speaks up and wants to talk about them again. :3

By "someone" I'm guessing you mean mods and/or the tagging team? ^^
Quite a few regular users have been talking a lot again about various rejected ideas, and as time passes, they may just become more necessary. D: If they keep being brought up again, when do they start being discussed again?

[Yatchen]

I do mean mods/taggers. It's like the orange haired tag. People kept bringing it up, and one day someone said, "hey, maybe we should think about this again." Or if enough regular users mentioned the same rejected tag and had examples and reasons for it, we might look at it again.

But most things are rejected for a reason, and those reasons usually stand.

[Kairi-chan]

I do mean mods/taggers. It's like the orange haired tag. People kept bringing it up, and one day someone said, "hey, maybe we should think about this again." Or if enough regular users mentioned the same rejected tag and had examples and reasons for it, we might look at it again.

But most things are rejected for a reason, and those reasons usually stand.

Well, I tried to give as many reasons as I could, and followed the format. But I understand. I guess I'll have to find where these tags were discussed and see what the reasons for their rejection were. I've got some searching to do~

[yong]

How about "Monster" tag?
Creature such as cenco from Cencoroll and the monsters from pokemon for example, would be more suitable to use such tag.
and make it as a child tag of "animal" tag.

[RockRabbit]

suggested two times before...didn't see anyone saying anything about it~

[Hopeful_Encounter]

A monster could be so many things though, it could even be a human in someone's eye. Also would the monster tag also apply to dragons and such? A monster tag could be very opinionated. So not too sure how that would work out....

[Yatchen]

I still don't really support it...it's not like we're supporting monstrous things on the board. And there's miles of difference between Cenco and something like http://e-shuushuu.net/images/2010-03-09-254121.jpeg . :T

[Merun]

Monster bunny http://e-shuushuu.net/image/355620/

[Naijca]

Monster bunny http://e-shuushuu.net/image/355620/

Eh, there's no need to tag something that goes as something else. (i.e. "animal")
Plus, if you look close enough, it's not the bunny that is large - it's the girl that's small.

The tag seems way to uncommon for images either way.

[Merun]

Hey I was just kidding xD