Let's say you post an image that lacks a watermark of any kind. It stays there for a year or so
Now, you found the original version of the image as it first debuted on the Internet, and it has a watermark, and it becomes apparent that the initially posted version has had the signature/watermark/whatever removed by a secondary user.
Should the watermark-less one stay?
When a repost has a "first-party" watermark
Re: When a repost has a "first-party" watermark
It wasn't obvious to me whether the watermark was originally part of the image or not, but I'm no photoshop detective. *shrugs* We don't have a policy for situations like this so I just went for the watermarkless image. I can change which one is set as a repost if you think that'd be better.
![Image](http://data.die2nite.com/gfx/loc/en/105x39.gif)
![Image](http://s1.bild.me/bilder/110211/3036608mamigunswink.gif)
Mami chibi drawn by Jiino, animated by me. | Sophie sig by Misuzu | My Anime-Planet page
RockRabbit wrote:but you know, not every image has a source and not every character has a name :3
Re: When a repost has a "first-party" watermark
I would appreciate it. Hard to say how, but I think that would influence some matters outside of shuu.