sort by Post Date/malfunction?

Anything shuushuu related that doesn't fit into the other forums :)
Post Reply
User avatar
amfest
Posts: 949
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:09 am
Location: Kingdom of Texas

sort by Post Date/malfunction?

Post by amfest »

I was looking through the recent comments as I usually do when I noticed that instead of seeing a Sept recent post the next comment posting was an april 16 comment from this year . .I was like ..errr . .then the next one was okay .. then after that an april 10th comment from this year followed by a july 19th comment.

these are the ones that snuck in

http://e-shuushuu.net/image.php?mode=view&image_id=2
http://e-shuushuu.net/image.php?mode=vi ... e_id=49835
http://e-shuushuu.net/image.php?mode=view&image_id=69

I do 15 per page . these were on the 2nd page for me . .though I guess that doens't matter since new comments will push them away but I was wondering if there was some error with these particular ones that is causing them to show up as recent comments though they aren't.
Image
User avatar
canis
Posts: 1076
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by canis »

It's not only post date but also the normal image date that is pretty messy.

Since I didn't check the image board from May to August and have to catch up the 700 pages I missed I often noticed that the order of the images changes everytime I log on. o_O Like when I set my bookmark on an image and also memorize which images came before the bookmarked one and which where below it, next time I return there are different pictures.

I also had that trouble today when I just wanted to read all e-chuuchuus I missed. I set it on only showing e-chuuchuu tagged images but I still had a hard time finding all the hidden intention numbers in the right order. Even though it was set on image date (I really double checked that several times), it showed vol. 11 as the oldest one and vol. 1 much later. o_O Also some e-chuuchuus from 2006 where mixed with the 2007 ones.

Even though I experienced this for awhile now, I was still not sure if there might still be something wrong on my side, but since I don't seem to be the only one with that problem, there might really be something wrong with the function itself.
Post Reply